The Future of Esoteric Christianity

By Richard Smoley

Originally printed in the JULY-AUGUST 2008 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Smoley, Richard. "The Future of Esoteric Christianity." Quest  96.4 (JULY-AUGUST 2008):131-134.

Theosophical Society - Richard Smoley is editor of Quest: Journal of the Theosophical Society in America and a frequent lecturer for the Theosophical Society

WHAT EXACTLY IS THE REALM OF THE esoteric and why is it so difficult to approach? The word esoteric is a curious one. It comes from Greek roots meaning "further in," and its ancestor, the adjective esoterikos, was first used in antiquity to refer to the writings of philosophers that were meant for their students rather than for the public at large. Practically all the surviving works of Aristotle are "esoteric" in this sense, consisting chiefly of his lecture notes that were edited by his students after his death. Exoteric, by contrast, means "further out"—that which was publicly available.
 
For the mystery religions of classical antiquity, the exoteric aspect was the myth itself—in the case of the mysteries of Eleusis, for example, of Demeter rescuing Persephone from Hades. This myth was publicly known, but its inner meaning was revealed only to initiates. As a result, today this esoteric meaning is a matter of speculation: devotees of these cults were sworn to secrecy, and generally speaking, they kept their oaths. (One possible exception is the tragedian Aeschylus, who was once prosecuted for revealing too much of the mysteries in his plays.) Nevertheless, it's easy to see how the mysteries of Eleusis resemble the death and resurrection myths that are so prominent in ancient Mediterranean religion. They also bear a strong similarity to esoteric teachings that we know today, in which the lower self must symbolically die in order for the higher self to be born.
 
Even this extremely brief sketch reveals a crucial difference between the two levels. The exoteric level was a story given out to everyone; most people believed it naïvely. But when someone suspected that there was more to this myth than met the eye, he or she was taken aside and initiated into its real meaning. It very likely had to do with the fact that human life does not end with death, as we gather from Cicero, the Roman statesman and philosopher, who wrote in De Legibus: "These mysteries have brought us out of a rustic and crude existence to a genuinely human life. The rites are called 'initiations,' and indeed they have initiated us into the true principles of life, giving us reason not only to live happily but to die with better hope" (2.36).
 
When proto-catholic Christianity, one of many strains of Christianity that existed in the first two centuries and ancestor of the present-day Catholic and Orthodox churches came onto the scene, it spread rapidly. After allying with the secular power of the Roman Empire in the fourth century, it eventually edged out and suppressed its competitors, in part, because its model, that of the mystery religions, was already familiar. Its only real difference—and its major selling point—was its claim that the death and resurrection of Jesus was not a myth but an actual event that had taken place in the recent past.
 
What, then, were the esoteric teachings of ancient Christianity? If you were to ask most conventional theologians today, they would answer that what was the esoteric meaning in antiquity, is for us today, the exoteric meaning: that Christ came down from heaven, died for our sins, was raised from the dead, and so on. However, the problem with this answer is that these teachings were never esoteric; they were common knowledge even in antiquity. Annie Besant quotes third-century Father Origen who addresses this issue in Contra Celsum, a refutation of Celsus, a pagan critic of Christianity:

 

Moreover, since he [Celsus] frequently calls the Christian doctrine a secret system [of belief], we must confute him on this point also, since almost the entire world is better acquainted with what Christians preach than with the favorite opinions of philosophers. For who is ignorant of the statement that Jesus was born of a virgin, and that He was crucified, and that His resurrection is an article of faith among many, and that a general judgment is announced to come, in which the wicked are to be punished according to their deserts, and the righteous to be truly rewarded? And yet the Mystery of the resurrection, not being understood, is made a subject of ridicule among unbelievers. In these circumstances, to speak of the Christian doctrine as a secret system, is altogether absurd. But that there should be certain doctrines, which are [revealed] after the exoteric ones have been taught, is not a peculiarity of Christianity alone. (44)

 

Origen is saying that the claim that Christ rose from the dead is not the esoteric meaning—not "the Mystery of the resurrection." What is it, then? To explore this question fully is beyond the scope of this article. I have discussed it in my book Inner Christianity, and in Theosophical literature, Annie Besant's Esoteric Christianity gives the best account. But in short, we can say there is a correlation of the mystery of the death and resurrection of Christ with the "death" of the lower self (the day-to-day persona with which we usually identify) which is reborn as the true Self, sometimes called the spirit or the "true I." As such, the resurrection of Christ becomes not merely a matter of blind belief or historical research but one of profound inner transformation.
 
This fact indicates why esotericism is so difficult to approach. An overwhelming majority of people are not particularly interested in it and instead want comparatively little from spirituality: some sense of community, a guideline for ethics, and hope for the afterlife. Esotericism provides none of these things in a ready-made fashion. The esoteric path, especially at first, is likely to create a sense of differentiation between the initiate and the world at large. If it imparts a sense of ethics higher than the common variety, it also reveals that much of what usually passes for morality is merely custom and convention. And if it provides hope, or even knowledge, of an afterlife, it raises profound questions about the nature of the Self that survives the body's demise.
 
The religious authorities are also frequently ambivalent, if not hostile, to esoteric awakening. An individual with his or her own direct contact with spiritual realities is less likely to need the priests. Furthermore, a religion is directed by genuine initiates for only a comparatively short time. As a religion grows in secular power, it attracts those who are interested in power, and these individuals are generally those who are least aware or capable of spiritual development. In Christianity, we can see this trend as early as the first and second centuries AD—the time of the arising of the proto-catholic church.
 
As a result of this process, the religion that was originally meant to serve as an outer court to esoteric truths became the chief impediment to it. Christ spoke of this danger when he said: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer yet them that are entering to go in" (Matt. 23:13). Ironically, the authorities who invoke the name of Jesus most often are the ones who most often violate this precept.
 
All this leads to the question of the proper relationship between esotericism and exotericism in Christianity today. Some insist that there can be no esotericism without exotericism. The best-known advocates of this view are the Traditionalist school, exemplified by the twentieth-century Swiss philosopher Frithjof Schuon. In Transcendent Unity of Religions, Schuon argued that esotericism and exotericism were inextricably linked and that one could not exist without the other. Schuon also had an apparently limitless faith in the capacity of the great world religions for self-renewal:

 

Nothing is more misleading than to pretend, as is so glibly done in our day, that the religions have compromised themselves hopelessly in the course of the centuries or that they are now played out. If one knows what a religion really consists of, one also knows that the religions cannot compromise themselves and they are independent of human doings. . . . The fact that a man may exploit a religion in order to bolster up national or private interests in no wise affects religion as such . . . as for an exhausting of the religions, one might speak of this if all men had by now become saints or Buddhas. In that case only could it be admitted that the religions were exhausted, at least as regards their forms.

 

I am not so sure. To accept Schuon's claim, one would have to believe that today's world religions express the truths of spiritual realities as well as they can be expressed on planet Earth. I can see very little evidence to support such a view. Instead, the history of religion shows a progression or evolution in expressing the spiritual impulses of humanity. For example, until about 2000 years ago, animal sacrifice was a universal part of religious observance. Today it is despised as the relic of an earlier and more barbarous era.
Animal sacrifice fell into obsolescence, in fact, with the coming of the great world religions, all of which were founded between 700 BC and 700 AD. Even the faiths that existed before this point—such as Judaism and Hinduism—were transformed into radically new versions that earlier practitioners might or might not even have recognized. The Vedic horse sacrifice and the immolation of lambs and bullocks at the Temple in Jerusalem were replaced by deeper, more sophisticated approaches to the divine.
 
Thus, it would seem, the world religions express a particular phase of human development. Astrologers call this epoch the Age of Pisces, and it may be no coincidence that they also associate Pisces with religion. Today, there is a widespread belief that we are entering or have entered the Age of Aquarius (as there is no consensus about exactly when one Age ends and the other begins). As the Age of Pisces passes, will the age of religion pass as well?
 
There is no reason to believe that the world religions as they are today represent the supreme or ultimate form of this exoteric faith, and there is much to suggest that they do not. In the coming centuries it seems likely that these religions will be transformed, yet again, into versions of themselves that will be practically unrecognizable to the present era.
 
Where, then, does this leave Christianity? Which of its teachings express eternal truths, and which merely reflect the limited perspective of the Age of Pisces? Again, this is an enormous question, but we can at least glimpse an answer in some of the facts we have examined in this essay. In the Age of Aries (the predecessor to the Age of Pisces), God was supplicated through the blood sacrifice of animals, as we see in the Old Testament. The Age of Pisces replaced this on an exoteric level with the doctrine of the vicarious atonement, whereby Christ came down from heaven and suffered and died to serve as a perfect expiation for the sins of Adam and his offspring. Although we can see it as an advancement on literal blood sacrifice, today this view itself is no longer satisfactory. Why, after all, should God, having become irked at the human race because someone ate a piece of fruit six thousand years ago, feel the need to send a part of himself down to earth and have it tortured to death as a way of making it up to himself? Put this way, it sounds ridiculous, but this is nothing more than a capsule description of the doctrine of the vicarious atonement. The human race is ready for something different, something, we may hope, that is more advanced and more profound.
 
An esoteric perspective offers such an advancement. The death of Christ to appease a peevish and self-important deity may no longer inspire us in a literal sense, but if we see it as a type of the sacrifice of the lower self to the higher dimensions within ourselves, it again becomes mysterious and sublime. Even so, I would not want to suggest that this perspective is itself absolute. Besant made this point obliquely in titling her book, which in full is called Esoteric Christianity, or the Lesser Mysteries. The "lesser mysteries" are those relating to individual human evolution; even these are merely a prelude to the "greater mysteries" of the cosmic sacrifice.
 
All this said, where can this perspective fit into Christianity as we know it today? All but the comparatively liberal denominations would have an extraordinary amount of difficulty accepting this perspective theologically, and the liberal denominations may not care: more and more they appear to be preoccupied with social rather than spiritual matters. Not long ago I found myself in Northampton, Massachusetts, with a spare half-hour and decided to go into the Episcopal church downtown to meditate. Unfortunately, I had chosen the time when the vestry board was meeting, and they were having a very loud and vexed discussion about their church's position on gay clergy. I soon decided to meditate in the comfort and privacy of my car, instead. "That pretty much sums up the Episcopal church today," I thought as I walked out. "You can't meditate because they're making too much noise arguing about gay rights." These social issues are of pressing interest to many, no doubt, but they come close to displacing spiritual life as the central concern of American religion today.
 
One way around these difficulties might be the forming of a church or denomination that is specifically orientated toward the esoteric perspective. The Liberal Catholic Church, founded by Theosophists in 1916, is perhaps the most visible attempt in this direction; there is also the Christian Community, founded by followers of Rudolf Steiner in 1922. Some independent con-gregations also foster an esoteric orientation. Current examples include Stephan Hoeller's Ecclesia Gnostica in Hollywood; the Ecclesia Gnostica Mysteriorum in Palo Alto, California; and Spirit United Church in Minneapolis. Nevertheless, denominationalism in itself has a propensity to be divisive, and one can easily ask whether what Christianity today needs is yet another denomination.
 
I may not be the best person to deal with this question, as my own approach over the years has been highly eclectic and personalized, and I have preferred working in small, informal groups rather than through a church as such. Although this approach has, I believe, served me well, others may not find it suitable; and in any case the spiritual curriculum is highly individualized, as A Course in Miracles, that great monument of contemporary esoteric Christianity, reminds us. But this feature may itself be a characteristic of the coming age. My good friend Alice O. Howell, author of The Dove in the Stone and The Heavens Declare, occasionally shares her memories of her studies with M., an enigmatic Rosicrucian master in New York in the 1940s and '50s. The spirituality of the future, M. said, would be focused in small groups. "The problem is," he added with a chuckle, "you'll never know how many of you there are."
 
M.'s point hits home on a number of different levels. In today's world, we live under what the French esotericist Rene Guenon called "the reign of quantity," where the value of everything is calculated by the ever-present consideration of how much and how many. Can the esotericism of the future appeal to the broad mass of humanity? Maybe, maybe not. But esotericism is principally about quality, not quantity, and the small groups of which M. spoke have always been the real catalysts for spiritual transformation. Christ alluded to this truth in his parable: "The kingdom of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal till it was all leavened" (Matt. 13:33). So it is likely to be both today and in the future.
 
In any event, these issues are real and pressing, as our civilization seems to be wrestling with the role Christianity and religion as a whole are to play in the collective life of humanity. At this point, it is probably more important to ask questions and follow the threads of various possibilities rather than setting out party platforms or fashioning flags for people to follow.

 

References

 

Besant, Annie. Esoteric Christianity. Reprint. Wheaton, IL: Quest, 2006.
Guenon, Rene. The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times. Translated by Lord Northbourne. Reprint. Hillsdale, NY: Sophia Perennis, 1994.
Schuon, Frithjof. "No Activity without Truth," Studies in Comparative Religion 3, no. 4 (1969). (wwwstudiesincomparativereligion.com)
———. The Transcendent Unity of Religions. Wheaton, IL: Quest, 1984.
Sedgwick, Mark. Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. NY: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Smoley, Richard. Inner Christianity: A Guide to the Esoteric Tradition. Boston, MA: Shambhala, 2002.

 


Richard Smoley is the author of Inner Christianity: A Guide to the Esoteric Tradition and Forbidden Faith: The Secret History of Gnosticism. His other works include Hidden Wisdom: A Guide to the Western Inner Traditions (written with Jay Kinney) and The Essential Nostradamus. His latest book is Conscious Love: Insights from Mystical Christianity. He is editor of Quest Books. Visit his blog at


Speculating About Angels

By John De Hoff

Originally printed in the March - April 2005 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: De Hoff, John. "Speculating About Angels." Quest  93.2 (MARCH - APRIL 2005):54

Nearly sixty years ago, the spring of 1945, I was on my way to Paris for a three day leave. About seven o'clock in the morning, eight or ten of us from the 123rd Evacuation Hospital were riding in the back of a deuce and a half, the Army's two-and-a-half-ton truck. One can't easily sleep in transportation like that, especially on the way to Paris for the first time, but we were also not in any serious conversation. All was quiet. Suddenly, with no warning, I heard a voice in the center of my head, a man's voice I'd never heard before. The words were: You are going back to Baltimore. That was all. No introduction, no explication, no conclusion—just that voice and message.

Since then, I've heard of this sort of experience happening to two or maybe three other people. Without warning, and in the same fashion, they described almost identically, "a voice in the center of my head that said . . ."

I have never been satisfied with my attempts to identify, place or understand this voice or its simple message, any more than did the others I spoke with, until I read an article that stressed the importance of angels as messengers. It still left me with more questions than answers: Where do the angels get the messages they carry? Where do they come from? How do they know to whom they should deliver the message? Who sends those messages?

Speaking or writing about angels is fraught with difficulties. Their life form or existence must be as different as the cultural differences that exist in our three-dimensional physical world. And as humans it is as difficult for us to consciously know or comprehend the fourth or fifth dimensions as it would be for two-dimensional people, if they existed, to understand us. But it seems reasonable to consider that our world has other existences, even beings, and in more than three dimensions. The so called spirit world is another dimension, and there may well be even more "beings," who are different expressions of God's incredible Self, working in any of several other dimensions. (Sure, that's guesswork, but what the heck.)

Angels may be among other life forms than the physical in which we are currently embedded. Angels must be purposed differently, perhaps (or probably) existing in dimensions less familiar than our customary three. In another, but similar fashion, we humans share this earth with many different forms of life—animal, vegetable, mineral—each with its multiple "divisions." Perhaps unfortunately, artists have portrayed angels to fit religious concepts, not to replicate their own actual visions of angels, as would a portraitist who faces a living model. Artists give angels human form, even show them with six extremities, possibly to express differences more perceived than observed by either the artist or the ecclesiastic contracting for and consulting on the painting.

Encounters with angels occur under various circumstances. One person reports meeting an angel others may hear an angel's voice, and a third interprets the meeting as hearing a choir of angels. Any human witness may more aptly be said to have sensed the angelic meeting, just as one senses a ball game from a box seat or the bleachers. We say that we saw it or we were there and heard the crowd roar, but it was through our senses that we received the visual or auditory vibrations, and through our nervous system (and brain) that we interpreted or saw or heard. Can it be that we sense the presence and the messages of angels in some fashion other than through our physical senses, our eyes and ears? If so, we might easily misinterpret these contacts as having occurred via the customary ocular or auditory channels, and report that we saw or heard them.

One can guess that angels, therefore, are like the Western Union workers who used to deliver telegrams to businesses, all quite impersonally. They wore olive drab uniforms emblazoned with Western Union, usually rode bicycles from the telegraph office, and were impressive for the nature of their work rather than for their own identity.

Yet angels are so different, their messages so important, that artists set them up as creatures far different, a little holier than us humans. Perhaps they are not so special (just as Western Union boys were simply people dressed in Western Union uniforms), but their messages are more or less special.

Were we to be consciously aware of living with, say, an angelic kingdom, would we then have to consider the existence of bad angels, those more nearly demonic? If angels are correctly conceptualized primarily as messengers, how can we become better or more nearly accurate receivers of their news, their messages? Is this even necessary? Are angels more important than we are in God's work? Given a relationship between us and other beings, how can we in our human dimension relate more effectively to those angels of another dimensional class, if and when communication is warranted? Now I can better understand that what I received on that spring morning in France was probably a message, an angelic one at that.

I had been toying with the idea of moving away from Baltimore after the war was over to practice medicine in Oregon or Washington. Actually, and not in any manner planned at the time of my wartime trip to Paris, I moved to New York City for a residency in psychiatry at the New York Hospital. I soon realized, however, that it was not right for me and moved back to Baltimore.


John DeHoff, a retired physician, is a long-time member of the Theosophical Society. He lives in Maryland.


A Visit to John of God

Printed in the Summer 2016  issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Samarel, Nelda, "A Visit to John of God" Quest 104.3 (Summer 2016): pg. 101-105

By Nelda Samarel

Theosophical Society - Nelda Samarel, longtime student of the Ageless Wisdom, has been director of the Krotona School of Theosophy and a director of the Theosophical Society in America.In 2011 I was scheduled to teach the winter school at the center for the Theosophical Society in Brazil, one hour from Brasília. It seemed an opportune time to visit Abadiânia, the home of the world-renowned healer, John of God. After all, I was “in the neighborhood” and, since I have been practicing and teaching the energetic healing modality known as Therapeutic Touch for over thirty-five years, my interest as a healer was keen.

According to Google Maps, the trip from the Theosophical center to Abadiânia should be two hours and thirty-two minutes. However, we took a “short cut,” and the resultant four-hour ride took us through the bucolic Brazilian countryside.

Arriving in Abadiânia, my home for the next week, I was struck by the poverty of the rural town. As I learned the following day, most of Abadiânia is structured around and economically dependent on the Casa de Dom Inácio de Loyola, or “the Casa,” as the location of John of God’s clinics is known. Scattered throughout the small town are pousadas, inns where visitors to the Casa are housed; restaurants; Internet cafes; and shops selling essentials for travelers.

The pousada in which I stayed is owned by and designed for Americans, containing extra comforts not always available at other pousadas. This includes items such as window screens, Internet, familiar food, and an English-speaking staff. Although I tend to be an adventurous traveler, it seemed prudent to provide a high level of comfort for myself in the event that I would undergo a healing. The pousada provided three simple but delicious meals daily, a private room complete with hammock and writing desk, and beautiful grounds. Most importantly, the other guests, about twenty in total, all spoke English. We became like a family, sharing our experiences and taking care of each other.

Normally first-time visitors come with a guide who organizes transportation from the U.S., arranges for lodging, assists with formulating and translating requests for healing; accompanies you to the Casa, guides you through the phases of the process, and generally cares for you during your entire stay. Being comfortable traveling alone, and having read a fair amount about John of God and the healing process, I had opted for minimal guide services.

Who Is John of God?

João Teixeira de Faria, internationally known as John of God, born in Brazil in 1942, is a medium and a healer. He maintains, “I do not cure anybody. God heals, and in his infinite goodness permits the Entities to heal . . . I am merely an instrument in God’s divine hands.” It is estimated that, directly or indirectly, he has treated up to 15 million people during the past forty years. John of God, referred to as “the medium,” has no medical training, but permits past doctors’ and spiritual teachers’ spirits, referred to as “the Entities,” to use his body and consciousness to diagnose and treat individuals. When he is healing, he is referred to as “the Entity.”

It is said that thirty-three entities work with John of God. Some of these include medical doctors: Oswaldo Cruz (1872–1917), Augusto de Almeida (1871–1941), Bezerra de Menezes (1831–1900); and José Valdivino; saints: Francis Xavier, Francis of Assisi, Joan of Arc, and Ignatius Loyola; archangels: Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, and Uriel; and great souls: Jesus Christ, Morya, St. Germain, and Koot Hoomi.

From my own experience, I cannot attest to the fact that any of these Entities were present through John of God, the medium. But I can attest that, although I saw him, the physical man, on three successive days, and came within two or three feet of him each day, it was as if I was with three different people. It seemed that I was with the same person (or Entity?) the first two days, but on the third day he was entirely different. His eyes were the eyes of a different being, and his entire countenance was that of someone else.

João left school after the second grade. He had his first healing experience when he was sixteen and began performing healings in Abadiânia in 1978 at age thirty-six. Soon after, he founded the Casa there. In 1981 he was tried for practicing medicine without a license, but an outpouring of public support resulted in an acquittal. One year later there was an attempt on his life.

The medium is at the Casa every Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, and has healing sessions mornings and afternoons on each day, beginning at 8 a.m. and not leaving until all healings are completed. Every week, approximately 1500–2000 people visit for healing. He sees each one on all three days. Thus he may have up to 6000 sessions each week. There is no charge for healing, but donations are welcome.

Healing Practices at the Casa

The Casa is a complex of single-story structures, all painted white with blue trim. Both the interiors and exteriors are spartan and clean, providing only the bare necessities. The main building includes an assembly room where all enter and wait for the healing sessions. The room is open to the air and has a small stage at the front. Other rooms in this building include a room for surgeries, a recovery room, a room for discarded wheelchairs and crutches, and two “current rooms,” obtaining their names from the palpable healing energy, or current, generated by John of God along with hundreds of meditators. There also are buildings containing a kitchen and dining facilities, offices, restrooms, a pharmacy, and a store. Outdoors are sitting areas and gardens and a large parking area for buses, cars, and taxis.

Before arriving at the Casa, I was instructed to write three very brief requests for healing. These requests would later be translated into Portuguese, the only language the medium speaks. It is not every day that one has the opportunity to make healing requests of a medium in Abadiânia, so I obsessed over what to ask and changed the requests numerous times. I finally settled on three requests, two of a spiritual nature and one for physical healing of my spine. My rationale was that, given this unique opportunity, spiritual requests were of much greater importance as, unlike physical healing, they may be carried to future incarnations.

Outside the assembly room are a window and counter, behind which are two volunteers, translating and helping people to shorten requests. I had used an online translator program for my requests, so I asked one of the Casa translators to check them for me and make any necessary corrections.

By 7:45 a.m., everyone requesting healing is seated or standing in the assembly room waiting for the morning session. On the days when there are healing sessions, everyone entering the Casa is required to wear white, as it is believed that white helps maintain a higher vibrational frequency. In the assembly room were several hundred persons sitting on benches and on the floor, and standing far back into the courtyard. Many more were to arrive. Because I was aware of the crowds, I arrived at 7:15 and was seated in the first row of benches, directly in front of the stage. A few more formalities, and then all were requested to recite the Lord’s Prayer, the only religious rite at the Casa.

When it was announced that people who were to see the Entity for the first time were to form a line, I took my place in the long line, holding the paper with my three healing requests. The line moved slowly through the next room, the first current room, where approximately 100 people seated on wooden benches were meditating. We silently and slowly continued through this room and entered the second, larger, current room, also filled with people meditating, until we reached the front, where the Entity was seated on a small platform. Throughout this room were several extremely large crystals, some of them at least four feet in height.

As I approached the Entity, with three or four people ahead of me in line, an assistant approached me and took my requests. This assistant, like all who work at the Casa, was a volunteer. He walked with me until I was in front of the Entity and gave my requests to him. The Entity looked at me, looked at my requests, and said something to the assistant, which was translated to me as “Take the medicine.” The Entity then scribbled something illegible on a fresh scrap of paper and handed it to me. This was my “prescription” for the herbs I was to take. The entire process was less than fifteen seconds, and the assistant ushered me to the next room. I must say that I was terribly disappointed. I’m not certain what I expected, but this certainly was a letdown.

I proceeded to the Casa pharmacy to have my prescription filled. There I received a jar of herbs made, I believe, from dried flowers, that I was to take as directed for forty-two days. I later learned that all the bottles contained exactly the same herbs, but the Entity psychically impressed something on the prescription paper and the “pharmacist” filling the prescription, also a medium, transferred that impression into the bottle she handed to me. To my Western way of thinking, this all seemed far-fetched.

Following healings, everyone is instructed to go to the large kitchen and outdoor dining area, where each person who receives healing is given a bowl of homemade soup infused with healing vibrations. The soup is prepared in huge pots, more like cauldrons, by volunteers. As I stood in line waiting to receive my soup, I looked around and saw an amazing variety of others who were receiving healing. There were people like me who had the luxury of traveling thousands of miles out of curiosity, others who traveled in the hopes of curing serious illness, and people from all over Brazil who traveled great distances by bus to see the Entity. These travelers actually slept on their buses during the days of travel and while staying at the Casa. There were people in wheelchairs, on crutches, deformed children, and babies being carried. It seemed that I was surrounded by pain and suffering. I thought that if only a fraction of these people were helped, then all the effort was worthwhile.

As mentioned before, there is a room at the Casa that is filled with crutches and wheelchairs. I was told that these were left by people who came and experienced complete healings so that these items no longer were needed. I was told stories of others who experienced full healing from serious and life-threatening illnesses.

My own experience was not so dramatic. Within a few days my spiritual questions were very clearly answered in my meditations, and several weeks after I returned home, my unrelenting and long-standing back pain suddenly disappeared. Alas, the pain relief was short-lived: I needed to have back surgery several months later. I wonder, however, if I had returned to the Casa, would I have been completely healed? Or was the pain temporarily relieved in order to permit me to emotionally prepare for the surgery that I required?

Surgeries

For many who visit, the Entity prescribes his own form of surgery, which may be either visible or invisible. Those receiving invisible surgery are called to sit together in a room with eyes closed for about ten minutes. The Entity then says something and tells them that they are healed and need to proceed, with caution, back to their pousadas by taxi and lie in bed for twenty-four hours, during which time their meals are brought to their rooms. People having invisible surgery with whom I have spoken said they felt as if they actually had surgery, with all the associated discomforts, and slept for most of the next twenty-four hours, after which they felt fine.

Some volunteered for visible surgery, which is performed publicly in the assembly room in front of patients who are waiting to be seen. The second day, as I was waiting to see the Entity, he came out into the hall with six assistants and three patients. All stood on the small stage in front. At that point I was seated on the edge of the stage, approximately four feet from where the Entity stood.

The first patient, a man, was instructed to stand facing the group. He opened his shirt so that his chest was exposed. The Entity waved his hand across the man’s forehead, then chose a knife from a tray held by one of the assistants and made a vertical incision about four inches in length into the man’s chest. The man was standing, eyes closed, smiling, and did not even wince as the incision was made. There were a only few drops of blood, which was amazing considering the depth of the incision. The Entity then made another incision parallel to the first but somewhat shorter. While this was happening, I saw the outline of a red equilateral triangle on the man’s chest, in a position so that the incisions were in the exact center. (The equilateral triangle is a symbol that is present throughout the Casa, with the three sides representing faith, hope, and love.)

The Entity placed his fingers inside both incisions, not wearing any gloves, moving his fingers. He then withdrew his fingers and took surgical sutures from a tray held by another assistant. He deftly and quickly sutured both incisions, obviously having much experience. Having worked as a nurse in emergency rooms in several hospitals, I never have seen more expert suturing.

That evening, when discussing this with others in my pousada who had also been sitting in the front of the room, I learned that no one else had seen a triangle. Much later on, when with one of the local young men who was driving me to the airport in Brasília, he explained that most people don’t see what I had seen, and that the triangle guided the location of the incisions. I have found no explanation for this.

The “Current,” or Energy

It is entirely possible that the healing at the Casa occurs because of the powerful energy there. Being a Theosophist and a long-time practitioner and teacher of Therapeutic Touch gives me some familiarity with energy and healing. According to Theosophical teachings, human beings are energy fields. It is the pattern and rhythm of that energy, its vibration, that determines our relative health or illness. Energy healing is strengthened when done in the midst of strong and vibrant energy fields.

It is said that part of Brazil has a geological foundation of crystal rock, a foundation that carries a high energy. This was quite apparent when I was at the Theosophical center outside Brasília, with its crystal foundation and abundant waterfalls. At the center, I taught Therapeutic Touch in the mornings and saw patients in the afternoons. Unexplained healings occurred during those afternoon sessions, healings that I could neither explain nor replicate. One such event was the case of a man with a large tumor which had been present for several months on his arm. He had seen a physician and had an MRI scheduled for the following week. He requested me to treat him with Therapeutic Touch. As I was doing Therapeutic Touch, I felt that my hands were being guided.

The next morning at breakfast he approached me and showed me his arm. The tumor was gone. There were other instances, but that is the most dramatic example, and I am certain that it was influenced by the energy present.

In addition to the energy of the crystal foundation in Abadiânia, there are several hundred people meditating in the rooms through which the patients to be healed pass as they approach the Entity. At the Casa, this is referred to as “sitting in current.”

Each who comes to be healed is expected to take their turn sitting in current, usually once every day. This involves arriving at the Casa before the start of the healing session, entering the current room between the hall and the large room where the Entity is seated, taking a seat on one of the wooden benches, keeping the eyes closed at all times, and meditating silently until all who have come to see the Entity have passed through the room and have been seen. The process takes between two and a half to four hours, depending on the number of people to be healed.

Also, in the large room where the Entity is seated, more people, both patients and mediums working with the Entity, are meditating while the line passes through. The large crystals mentioned earlier are placed throughout this room, further strengthening the energy.

The resultant power of all the beneficent energy created reminds me of the healing sessions at Pumpkin Hollow Retreat Center and Indralaya with the gifted Theosophical healer and clairvoyant Dora Kunz. Dora gathered large groups of nurses around her at her healing workshops for almost thirty years. All present, approximately seventy-five to ninety nurses and patients, meditated together before Dora’s healing sessions, producing a similar effect.

Additional Theosophical Parallels

According to John of God, illness may be explained karmically. It may be the result of karma for actions in a previous lifetime or earlier in this lifetime. Sometimes a life of illness may be chosen by the soul prior to reentering the physical world in order to more quickly work out previous karma, thereby achieving a more rapid spiritual progression. This is consistent with Theosophical teachings about karma and reincarnation.

Consistently with Theosophical teachings, John maintains that the body is healed from within. Theosophical doctrine also teaches that all manifests from within outwards.

John of God has said that, to be a medium “requires loving God above all else, and your fellow human beings as yourself.” He works long days and takes no remuneration. Clearly he is altruistic at heart. H.P. Blavatsky has told us, “True Theosophy is altruism, and we cannot repeat it too often.” Her teachers, the Mahatmas, emphasized having the welfare of humanity at heart. In this respect, we may say that John of God is a true Theosophist.

What Really Is Happening in Abadiânia?

Much has been written in the news media about what is going on in Abadiânia. Several have attacked John of God as a charlatan, denying the possibility of what they are calling “faith healing.” Those who pride themselves on having scientific minds say there is no proof that any healing has occurred. Experiment is the gold standard of scientific research and requires observation and measurement. The physicist Max Planck said, “Experiment is the only means of knowledge at our disposal.” According to the paradigm of experimental science, if it cannot be measured, it is not real.

I, too, pride myself on having a scientific mind. For decades I was a nursing researcher conducting federally funded studies. However, more and more we are understanding that not all phenomena are observable or measurable. Yet those phenomena are no less real. In fact Shankaracharya, the renowned exponent of Advaita Vedanta, maintained that if something can be measured, it cannot be real, implying that the real is beyond measure.

In 2012 Oprah Winfrey journeyed to the Casa and was taken with the veracity of what was happening, saying she had a “most powerful experience.” Researchers from Harvard visited and came to the conclusion that “something” was happening, although it could not be explained.

The fact is that there has been no research examining the efficacy of what is happening at the Casa. We have only the anecdotes of tens of thousands of people, many who have experienced healing and many who have not.

I have no explanations, nor do I have any certainties about what I experienced and witnessed in Abadiânia, but I do know that something is going on, something is happening, unexplainable as it may be.


Nelda Samarel, Ed.D., R.N., a longtime student of the Ageless Wisdom, has been director of the Krotona School of Theosophy and a director of the Theosophical Society in America. She serves on the executive board of the Inter-American Theosophical Federation. A retired professor of nursing and a researcher, Dr. Samarel has numerous publications and presents internationally.


Clairvoyance and Healing

Printed in the Summer 2016 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Smoley, Richard, "Clairvoyance and Healing" Quest 104.3 (Summer 2016): pg. 106-110

 

An Interview with Robyn Finseth 

By Richard Smoley 

Part of the Theosophical tradition, which goes back to its beginnings, has to do with clairvoyance. It’s by no means a skill that everyone has. In fact, those who are adept at clairvoyant vision are rare, even in the Theosophical Society. It would seem that there are only a few in each generation who have this ability and who have been able to cultivate it to the degree that they can make use of it.

One such person is Robyn Finseth. Raised in a Theosophical family, she possessed clairvoyant abilities at an early age and was able to develop them under the guidance of Harry van Gelder and his sister, Dora Kunz, who was no doubt the most distinguished Theosophical clairvoyant of her generation. Later Robyn trained as a chiropractor. Today she has a chiropractic practice in Portland, Oregon, where she uses her clairvoyant abilities as part of her overall skill set.

I met Robyn when she was visiting Wheaton a couple of years ago, and was very impressed by her insight. She and her husband came to visit my family and me at our home, and she seemed to have a very clear sense of us and our situation. When I was driving them back to Olcott, she turned to me and asked, “Did you want to be a novelist?” And in fact I had — with three unpublished novels in my desk drawer to prove it. Yet it was not a subject that had come up at all in our conversation, nor was it anything I had been thinking of in recent days or even weeks.

Naturally, when we set out to do an issue on healing, it occurred to me to interview Robyn about her abilities and how clairvoyant experience appears to her subjectively—as well as to find out how she uses them in her medical practice.

            This interview was conducted by e-mail in February-March 2016.

Theosophical Society - Robyn Finseth was raised in a Theosophical family and possessed clairvoyant abilities at an early age.  She developed them under the guidance of Harry van Gelder and his sister, Dora Kunz, who was no doubt the most distinguished Theosophical clairvoyant of her generation. Later Robyn trained as a chiropractor. Today she has a chiropractic practice where she uses her clairvoyant abilities as part of her overall skill set.Richard Smoley: Could you begin by talking about your background? How did you come to have clairvoyant abilities?

Robyn Finseth: I was, simply, born with this ability. I cannot remember a time when I could not see colors or auras or otherworldly things, whether they were of past human beings or animals or simply apparitions of a variety of entities. I am a second-generation Theosophist who was raised by parents (Beatrice and Ken Lawrence) who became members in their youth. Consequently, I was born into a family who could understand this “strange child” and not place me in a situation that could become either harmful or exploitative.

My grandmother had eighty acres of farm and forest. As a child I would sit in the woods for hours just observing the entities around the trees and the natural habitat. I also understood at a young age that not every child could perceive what I did; therefore I kept silent about my sight. In fact, I was terrified of others knowing what I could do. I made my parents promise that they would keep my secret and only share it with those who could help me understand this world. I am pretty sure that intuitively I understood that there was a certain danger in this for me, whether this understanding was from another lifetime of exploitation, or simply from realizing that my abilities needed to be respected and used wisely.

As a young child I was introduced to a gifted healer named Harry van Gelder (brother of Dora Kunz) who helped my mother with some health issues. I was maybe seven at the time, and I remember visiting him in Vancouver, where he was practicing as a licensed naturopath and osteopath. He was a skilled clairvoyant who used these gifts in his healing, and it was there that I began my journey into health care. I remember the first time I saw him and how he practiced, inspiring me to one day be a doctor too — pretty strong thoughts for someone so young. But I never varied from this path; I just took some time getting there.

There were many prominent adults who were respected in this field of vision who helped me as a child. I was part of the service of the TS called the Knights of the Round Table, led by Perry and Edith Karsten, both prominent in the Portland Lodge, along with Anna Berkey. Many times both Perry and Anna helped me understand what I could and couldn’t do, without placing undue emphasis on either. They helped me balance my life without losing my way in this alternative universe. Believe me, this alternative universe is quite intoxicating even for a child. I remember spending hours in my room or alone, enjoying a world that only I could see. And just hearing myself say these words, I can only imagine what a psychologist would have done to me had I been born to another type of family. I suspect I would have been silent about everything.

So with the help of these friends both here and in my alternative universe, I was able to translate what I could do and see into the world of service.

Smoley: Tell us a little about your subjective clairvoyant experience. What do you see? How do you see it?

Finseth: Learning how to quiet the mind is one of the easiest explanations of sight. Those who practice and use meditation in their daily lives seem to understand this phenomenon more easily than others. It is in this quiet that we allow ourselves to be one with self, world, and universe. It is in this quiet that we clearly understand our directions as human beings.

Colors were more vivid in my childhood, and I suspect it was because I didn’t question the colors or the strength of their impact as much as I do as an adult. I think what people really want to know is how do I do it, and I can only respond by saying that I don’t use my eyes and I do use my eyes. It is in the in-between sight that I actually see. It is the glimpse out of the corner of your eye rather than looking directly at the object. If I am looking at an aura, I never do so directly, but rather after I have seen the person. Then I often look away or avert my eyes to something else — without really seeing that something else; I am actually focusing on the aura itself. Now people’s auras are their personal space. Therefore I also am respectful of this fact and do not “look” unless asked to do so.

Smoley: Please talk about your use of clairvoyance in healing. What role does it play? How do you apply it?

Finseth: I am a practicing healer, licensed as a chiropractic physician in the state of Oregon, where I reside. When people ask to become my patients, they have automatically given me permission to use whatever means I have at my disposal to help them. In my world, that means I use all my senses, touch, sight (both ordinary and nonordinary), and the help of those who sometimes come in with the patient. Not all of my patients understand the depth of my ability, as it isn’t necessary; they simply understand that I will help them in any way I am allowed to do so. Even though I have these other gifts, I can only see what I can see and do what I can do. There are many other factors present when a person has either a condition or an illness; consequently even with these abilities sometimes I simply cannot help.

So when you think of the term clairvoyant healing, it really is not an accurate description. Rather I use clairvoyance to understand the problem, which is presented from all aspects. This is true whether or not it is a physical manifestation of an emotional or psychological problem or simply an injury sustained in life. I help patients understand their conditions from a perspective of learning, as — if it is simply an injury — learning how and why the body ended up in this situation. I know from personal experience if we truly understand the why of the question, we more often than not either fix it or simply avoid that situation in the future.

Many people do not understand the impact that strong negative emotions can have on the physical body. There are times when the person in front of me simply does not want to hear that they have any part in their condition, who believe that their body  “just needs to be fixed”; those I cannot help.

Smoley: What does a balanced person look like, and how do we achieve balance?

Finseth: In my chiropractic world, balance is the achievement of full spinal movement without restrictions or pain. It is a body given the right nutrition and exercise to operate at its best each and every day. Traditionally, healing is the balance of the physical, emotional, and mental fields. Healing is the ability to be honestly objective of self without being critical. As Theosophists, we use meditation to aid us in this honest, objective look. Through kindness and love we can achieve what we are ultimately hoping to achieve: balance of self in this life.

Energy is a very important part of balance. In my observation, we have two kinds of energy: core and renewable. The core is what we are born with, and the renewable is the energy we can tap after sleep, rest, or through meditation. We must be cautious when using the core, as it is nonrenewable; it is the energy that is tapped when the renewable has been used up. You have all experienced times when you said to yourself, “I am burning the candle at both ends.” You are literally burning into your life’s core. When the core is gone, so is your physical life.

Now I can’t talk about balance without introducing karma and previous lives. As Theosophists, we accept that this is but one of many lifetimes. Both personally and with others I have worked with, I have found, that often we understand, at a very basic level, that which is in front of us for this particular lifetime. I always think of my dear, sweet friend Linda Jo Pym, who said to me, “ I just want to learn what is needed this time so that next lifetime I can come back and not repeat this one all over again.” I love this thought, and when I personally am facing one of my many challenges, I think, “OK, let’s get it done so we don’t have to come back and do it all over again.” We have all experienced challenges that keep showing up. Well, listen to the challenge, and maybe the next time try a new approach.

Smoley: Where do you think healing needs to go today? How should it fit in with conventional medical approaches?

Finseth: The beauty of modern medical practices today is that our boundaries have shifted away from the traditional medical model. We have so many avenues to explore with the acceptance of alternative health care as part of the whole of medicine. We have the ability to no longer simply take one suggestion but to look into finding many suggestions before we decide for ourselves on the best course of action. The first thing I tell my patients is that they are truly the best source of knowledge about their own health care. The only thing we as doctors or nurses or healers can offer are suggestions about what direction may be the best route. You, as the keeper of your own body, will know better than anyone what direction is best for you. Finally, Americans are no longer limited by only one kind of health care but can seek it from many different types of approaches. The Internet has opened many avenues of exploration for everyone, so that we can be much more informed about alternatives to any disease or condition.

Indralaya, the Theosophical camp on Orcas Island off the coast of Washington state, has long supported Therapeutic Touch (TT), a program begun by Dora Kunz and Dolores Krieger. This program has bridged gaps all over the world, as it teaches students (often nurses and doctors) how to channel energy to help direct the body to its optimal state. I have met several nurses who have used these teachings successfully in a hospital setting. I cannot think of a more traditional medical model than a hospital. If we can have TT in this setting, I would say we have come a great distance in alternative acceptance.

When I first began working in my own state as a doctor in 1981, we were at the beginning of being allowed into insurance coverage for patients. Since this date, there aren’t any insurance programs I am aware of which do not allow a patient to explore alternative health care. I know Oregon is more progressive than many other states, as we also have a prominent naturopathic college in our midst. So in my opinion our health care is moving into the right direction, which is the marriage of all forms of health care.

Smoley: Could you share some of your memories of Dora Kunz?

Finseth: I was a very lucky little girl who had access to Dora Kunz at a very young age. During one of my many times at camp on Orcas Island, Dora was there, and my mother arranged to have her read my aura. During these years Dora always made herself available to any of us who wanted more information. I remember being terrified of this reading, afraid that my sight was all my imagination and not really sight at all. The only memory I have of what she said was to simply continue along the course I was on and that all was well with my direction. This was also around the time I was connected with her brother, Harry, who helped me with these abilities many times in my young adult life.

When I was a young girl, my mother got Dora’s book The Real World of Fairies: A First-Person Account. I loved this book, as it helped me understand what I was seeing and helped me sift through information no one else could help me grasp. I also read a book by a doctor who used Dora to diagnose illness in patients, a very powerful book for me during these formative years.

Dora was a very skilled clairvoyant, far more skilled than I. Her book The Personal Aura, written later with depictions of auras, has always help me understand much of what I see. The easiest aura to read is the emotional one. It’s constantly changing with thoughts and feelings.

In my early thirties I went back to school to get my final degree, this one as a chiropractor. During this time I took some time off from my studies and worked with Harry at his clinic in Ojai, California. I stayed with him for several months and during this time he helped me set the course of my healing direction. Some years later, I was visiting Wheaton when Dora was national president of the TS, and I asked her for another session. During this time, I remember we were sitting on the porch, enjoying the early spring, when I asked her if I should attend the TT sessions that were just beginning at camp. She looked at me and said, “Why would you? Aren’t you working with my brother?” I giggle at this memory. I only attended one session of TT many years later, when I took my husband up for treatments.

Dora was never one to mince words. During a particularly difficult time in my life I sought her out for advice, hoping for some insight. Her answer to me was simply “Get over it.” Harsh, but honestly just what I needed to hear.

Smoley: There’s a lot about clairvoyance in books of many kinds. Often it seems that there’s some gap between the way the books describe something and the way it really is. Do you find that this is true with clairvoyant abilities? If so, how?

Finseth: If you put five people in the same room with an object and asked these same five people to describe this same object, you would of course get five different responses — a thread of sameness, but all different. Well, the same would be true of five clairvoyants, as there are so many layers of sight. The aura itself has so many layers, and sometimes when I read something another has said, I can see some of what they report, but not necessarily all of it. Does that make my vision more perfect or less? I think the answer is neither. I simply have my own vision, and I am very comfortable with it in analysis. The others may be in the same position of comfort with their abilities. I will admit that it seems a bit fanciful when some people  have claimed sight, but who am I to say that it isn’t really there? In my youth and my early training, I was taught to look for the truth of what I sensed or saw, and sometimes it would take some distance away from the experience to see the truth of it. We all indulge in wishful thinking, but that is what we want to avoid. Our work is to discern the truth of words from the truth of actions.

Smoley: Many traditions, including Theosophy, warn about the dangers of psychism. How do you feel about these warnings? Are they right? Are they overstated?

Finseth: Any form of intuition can be dangerous if used improperly. We can delude ourselves into thinking we are or aren’t something that may or may not be true. I would be very wary of enrolling in a course of study that promoted “channeling spirits” or used questionable methods as a source of answers. I think there are dangers of opening up to the universe in such a way that you become vulnerable to forces that are not positive. There certainly is a negative element present in this world. It doesn’t take much to understand that there is negativity possible in any avenue or way of life. I trust myself, and when I meet someone who is dealing in less desirable measures, I simply avoid them, putting a protective cloud around myself and that person, if for no other reason than to help direct negative into positive. I am very wary of those who profess such powers as to truly “heal” another human being. I am not saying it isn’t possible, but at what cost to either recipient or sender?

So, yes, there are dangers along this path. I was very fortunate in my life that my teachers were far more skilled than I and could help me develop what I use today in my everyday life.  

Smoley: How would you advise someone who was interested in developing capacities like this?

Finseth: I have been asked this question a number of times in my life, and I find it a very difficult one to answer. I do not know how I developed this ability, but strongly suspect that I simply developed it over many lifetimes. Somewhere in my development this ability was not turned off, and for this I am extremely grateful, as it has helped me throughout my life to be better at my job. I guess the best advice I could give anyone is not to be “ambitious” in development, but rather, allow the self to develop. If it is meant to be for that person, then it is to be. It is also to be used with caution: this is an ability that is easy to misinterpret. I always love the saying from Dora Kunz: “Clairvoyance is overrated; after all, cats are clairvoyant.” My interpretation of this is to learn humility.

Although I have the ability to see beyond the physical world, I am cautious in doing so. I am always reminded that when looking at others, it is really their personal information. Unless they ask me for advice, it really isn’t my business. I will admit that I have sometimes been curious about what is happening to someone, and the image is unavoidable. But I am not a circus act either. If you stopped me on the sidewalk and said, “Read my aura,” I would refuse. This has happened to me, and when under pressure I simply shut down and all of my senses are no longer available. Besides, I feel a bit insulted.

So, yes again, there are dangers. As comfortable as I am, I would be very cautious in helping others along this path.



Subcategories